Warning: Declaration of Jetpack_IXR_Client::query() should be compatible with IXR_Client::query(...$args) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php on line 30

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack-ixr-client.php:0) in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831
{"id":1410,"date":"2015-07-21T21:53:14","date_gmt":"2015-07-21T21:53:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/?page_id=1410"},"modified":"2015-09-02T22:04:03","modified_gmt":"2015-09-02T22:04:03","slug":"8-demarini-cf6-bat-review","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/bat-reviews-forum\/bat-reviews\/8-demarini-cf6-bat-review\/","title":{"rendered":"-8 DeMarini CF6 Bat Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Balanced bats with a lower drop weight than -10 are very important as hitters move towards the eventuality of BBCOR, and the CF6 frequently gets overlooked as a viable option. We decided to put one through the paces to see if it deserves consideration, and how it compares to some of the more popular -8 options out there\u2026 here\u2019s what we found.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

First Impressions<\/h2>\n

Really nice looking bat. The dark grey and black with black DeMarini logo was subdued and not anywhere near as over the top as some of the graphics seen on numerous model VooDoo\u2019s, and most of our hitters were in agreement that it looked pretty cool.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Material\/Design<\/h2>\n

2-piece composite.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Weight\/Size<\/h2>\n

Size tested was a 30\/22. Actual weight\u2026 22.7 oz. (due to the extremely light\/balanced feel of this bat, the extra .7 oz. of bat weight doesn\u2019t make it feel any heavier than other balanced -8\u2019s that weighed in exactly as stamped).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Swing Weight<\/h2>\n

Very balanced bat, and extremely easy to get around. Several hitters said it was the lightest swinging -8 they\u2019ve ever felt, but here\u2019s where we got some difference of opinion. While every single hitter said that it was very balanced and extremely easy to swing, some said that it felt like there wasn\u2019t enough mass in the barrel and it felt like possibly too much of the weight of the bat was in the handle. This feeling was more prevalent with hitters who had been swinging -8\u2019s for some time or hitters who had already moved onto -5\u2019s, and was less common with those who were used to swinging -10\u2019s.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Barrel\/Profile<\/h2>\n

Longer barrel than a traditional profile bat, but less barrel than the benchmark -8 long barrel bats (-8 Combat\u2019s and -8 XL1). There\u2019s certainly more than enough barrel to square up baseballs on the sweet spot, but possibly extending the barrel a bit would give hitters the extra feeling of mass in the barrel that they were saying this bat lacks.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Grip<\/h2>\n

A big win on this bat. While not Lizard Skins (the most popular grip with our hitters), the stock DeMarini grip had just the right amount of tackiness, was not too thick, and had this great flare that led to an incredibly comfortable knob. Not only did the flare\/knob feel great in the hand, it made pinky wrapping\/dropping incredibly easy and comfortable. Quite possibly the most comfortable flare\/knob setup we\u2019ve seen on any stock bat, it feels like you could take BP with this bat for hours without beating up your hands.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Performance<\/h2>\n

Extremely solid on balls squared up on the barrel with very impressive exit speed and distance, and quite forgiving on those not squared up. Here\u2019s some of the give-and-take with this bat\u2026 there is definitely a nice amount of forgiveness on balls not squared up and a lack of negative feedback going to the hands, but several hitters thought that came with a price of the bat feeling a bit too flexible and that it felt a little numb due to the cancelling out of the negative feedback. This bat would definitely be most appreciated by those hitters looking for that traditional old school 2-piece feel, that puts flexibility and vibration cancelling high on the list of features. Sound was great, with a ceramic-like crack on well struck balls. If this bat were to continue to break-in and continue to get hotter, performance would definitely be in the upper echelon of other high performance composite -8 bats we\u2019ve used.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Durability<\/h2>\n

Several hundred hits on ours, and nothing more to note than the usual ball marks and scrapes. Really hope the grip holds up well, as it definitely stands out on this bat and makes it fun to swing.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Overall<\/h2>\n

If you\u2019re looking for a very balanced\/easy swinging high performance -8 and don\u2019t mind some flexibility, the lack of FB to the hands, and a little less mass and barrel length than some other composite -8\u2019s currently out there, this would definitely be a bat to take a look at. Performance was very good, sound was impressive, and our hitters who felt comfortable with this bat got some really nice distance out of it. This seems like it would be a great bat for a hitter having a bit of trouble transitioning out of his big drop weight bat (-10\/-12), and who is more put off by the bees buzzing in his hands than he is a fan of feedback.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

See all our bat reviews<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Balanced bats with a lower drop weight than -10 are very important as hitters move towards the eventuality of BBCOR, and the CF6 frequently gets overlooked as a viable option. We decided to put one through the paces to see if it deserves consideration, and how it compares to some […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":1365,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1410"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1410"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1762,"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1410\/revisions\/1762"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.baseballbats.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Notice: file_put_contents(): write of 316 bytes failed with errno=122 Disk quota exceeded in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cwis-antivirus-malware-detected/cwis-scan/config/debug.php on line 12

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only -1 of 316 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /home1/baseball/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cwis-antivirus-malware-detected/cwis-scan/config/debug.php on line 12